Skip to content
/ how the engine decides

No magic. A lot of opinions that have to agree.

Most bots fire when one indicator crosses a line. Ours asks 60+ independent methods the same question — is this a trade? — and only acts when enough of them say yes. Here is exactly how that works, with nothing hidden.

/ the problem with one signal

One line on a chart is a coin flip with extra steps.

An RSI cross. A moving-average flip. Each one is right sometimes and wrong constantly — and you never know which today. Trading a single indicator is trading noise.

/ so we ask many, not one

A room that reached consensus, not one analyst shouting.

01

Many methods read the same setup

Momentum, structure, order-book pressure, volatility, crowd positioning, news — 60+ methods, each reading the market a different way.

02

Each one votes: take it, or skip it

No single method can pull the trigger. They each cast a vote on the same setup, the same direction.

03

The trade fires only when enough agree

One loud indicator can not drag the whole room. The engine acts on agreement, not on the noisiest voice.

/ the seven approaches

Seven ways to read a market. All voting at once.

Not one magic formula — seven families of signal, each one a concept you already know. Familiar approaches; the depth underneath is ours.

Momentum & trend

Is price moving with conviction or running out of steam — across trend tools and relative strength.

Market structure & levels

Where the key levels, breaks, reversals and divergences are — the spots a market tends to react.

Order-book & flow

Who is in control right now — buyers or sellers — from the book, the tape and hidden size.

Volatility & risk regime

Quiet coil before a move, normal range, or a high-risk regime — the weather the trade lives in.

Crowd & funding

Has the crowd piled into one side, by funding and open interest — when that often precedes a reversal.

News & sentiment

Fresh high-impact stories and how they are leaning — the backdrop that can break any technical setup.

Account-risk guards

A seventh family that never votes for a trade — it only trims size on drawdown or correlated overload. Protecting you from yourself.

/ the methods aren't trusted equally

A scoreboard that updates every time a trade closes.

Not every method earns the same say. Each carries a weight that shifts based on how it has actually performed on your trades — the ones that keep being right get a louder vote, the ones that keep being wrong get quieter. It is not a fixed formula someone hard-coded once. It grades its own sources, continuously.

you read
one verdict, not 60 readouts
per setup
STRONG TAKE / TAKE / SKIP
attached
the risk-reward
on tap
the reasoning, if you want it
/ where it can be wrong — and we say so

Consensus isn't a crystal ball.

When the market regime shifts, every method can be late together. Agreement lowers your rate of bad trades — it does not promise winners. So: we publish the losers too, with the full reason why. Nothing auto-executes until you switch it on. And your keys never leave your exchange. The honest version of "40 signals agreed" is "40 signals agreed, and the market still does what it wants."

losses published too auto-execute off by default non-custodial

See the verdict on today's setups.