The edge is real. Your reaction time isn't.
Thirty setups a day, each one alive for seconds. You enter a half-tick late, hold the winner too long, and take the 31st trade on tilt. Build the rule once (what to monitor, the exact entry, the exit, the filters that keep you out of chop) and the engine fires it the same way every tick. Then prove it on history before a cent is real.
The setup is fine. The execution leaks.
A config that does exactly what you would.
Pick the asset and timeframe. Stack the entry conditions (RSI, order-book imbalance, market structure, divergence) with AND / OR logic. Add the filters that keep you out of chop: spread, news windows, market regime. Set the exit: take-profit ladder, stop, move-to-break-even. No code. Then it monitors every tick and pulls the trigger the same way, every time.
Conditions, not vibes
Entry, exit and up to five conditions with AND / OR logic: plus filters for spread, news and regime. The 1m setup you can describe, you can automate.
more →Prove it on history
Walk-forward, parameter sweep and monte-carlo, with fees, slippage and funding modeled, so the result looks like real money before any is.
more →Discipline on the 31st trade
Scalpers tilt hardest. After a losing streak, anti-tilt blocks new entries: closing and stops are never blocked. The lock is the feature.
more →“I stopped fat-fingering entries. The config takes the exact setup I would, minus the hesitation and the revenge trade after a red one.”
Same setup. Same execution. Every single time.
Order Book Imbalance Strategy: Making OBI Actually Tradeable
Depth windows
Does RSI Divergence Repaint? The Forming-Candle Problem
indicators computed on unclosed candles show a market state that has a good chance of never existing
Crypto Risk Management: Position Sizing and Stop Placement
How to size positions from stop distance